Career Employer

FREE FRM Study Guide 2026: Both Parts, Built to the GARP Exam

Every FRM topic — both parts — taught to the GARP exam: an interactive study guide with built-in quizzes, worked risk models, and flashcards.

Check sections to boost your score

Don't know where to start?

To find us again, just search “Career Employer FRM

By

This free FRM study guide teaches to the GARP Financial Risk Manager exam — both Part I and Part II, organized the way the exam is built.[1] The FRM is one of the most rigorous, quantitative credentials in finance, so this guide is deep: real teaching of the models, the formulas behind them, and the high-yield rules that decide pass/fail — not a summary.

And it’s interactive, not a wall of text: every Part I topic has a built-in checkpoint quiz, hover-able glossary terms, and concept questions, so you learn by doing.

Read it topic by topic, test yourself at each checkpoint, then round out your free FRM study resources with our practice questions and flashcards.

FRM Exam Snapshot

The FRM exam has two parts — pass Part I first

Part I builds the risk-management toolkit; Part II applies it to each major risk class. GARP only credits your Part II result once you have passed Part I.

Part I · 100 questions · 4 hoursThe tools of risk management
  • Foundations of Risk Management (20%)
  • Quantitative Analysis (20%)
  • Financial Markets & Products (30%)
  • Valuation & Risk Models (30%)
Part II · 80 questions · 4 hoursApplying the tools to each risk
  • Market Risk (20%)
  • Credit Risk (20%)
  • Operational Risk & Resilience (20%)
  • Liquidity & Treasury Risk (15%)
  • Risk & Investment Management (15%)
  • Current Issues in Financial Markets (10%)

Both parts are multiple-choice and pass/fail — Part I gates Part II.

FRM exam at a glance (2026)
DetailPart IPart II
Questions100 multiple-choice80 multiple-choice
Time4 hours4 hours
Topic areas46
Passing standardPass/fail; threshold set by GARPPass/fail; threshold set by GARP
SequencingTake firstGraded only after Part I is passed
Certifying bodyGARPGARP

Both parts are multiple-choice and pass/fail; GARP does not publish a fixed passing percentage — its Board sets the threshold each window.[1] You may sit both parts the same day, but Part II is only graded once you pass Part I, and you have four years from passing Part I to pass Part II. Spend your time where the weight is:[2]

FRM Part I exam weighting by topic (2026)
Financial Markets & Products30% · 30%
Valuation & Risk Models30% · 30%
Foundations of Risk Management20% · 20%
Quantitative Analysis20% · 20%

This guide covers all four Part I topic areas in depth — they are the foundation the whole credential is built on and the focus of our free practice questions — and then gives a structured overview of all six Part II areas so you can see the full path to the charter.[2]

1 · Foundations of Risk Management

20% of Part I. This area sets the vocabulary and frameworks for the entire credential: what risk is, the major risk types, how firms govern risk, and the ethics that bind FRM holders. It is conceptual, not calculation-heavy — high-yield because it underpins everything after it.

The four major financial risk types

The whole FRM curriculum is organized around identifying, measuring, and managing these risks. Part II is one deep dive per risk class.

Market riskLoss from moves in prices, rates, FX, equities & commodities. Measured by VaR & expected shortfall.
Credit riskLoss from a counterparty defaulting. PD × LGD × EAD; managed with limits, collateral & netting.
Operational riskLoss from failed processes, people, systems or external events. Includes fraud, cyber & legal risk.
Liquidity riskFunding liquidity (can't meet cash needs) and market liquidity (can't sell without moving price).

Plus business & strategic risk — but market, credit, operational, and liquidity risk are the core.

Risk Types & the Risk-Management Process

Financial firms face market risk (prices, rates, FX), credit risk (counterparty default), operational risk (failed processes, people, systems, or external events), and (cannot fund or cannot sell). The risk-management process is a loop: identify, measure, monitor, and manage, then report. A firm chooses to avoid, retain, mitigate, or transfer each risk — there is no goal of zero risk, only risk taken deliberately and paid for.

CAPM, Beta & Systematic Risk

The prices only — the market-wide risk you cannot diversify away, measured by . Written out, E(Ri)=Rf+βi(E(Rm)Rf) E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i \,(E(R_m) - R_f) . The market portfolio has a beta of 1.0. is removed by diversification, so the market does not reward it — a foundational idea behind every portfolio-risk measure later in the curriculum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance & RAROC

Comparing returns means adjusting for the risk taken. Know the core ratios:

Risk-adjusted performance measures
MeasureFormulaRisk it uses
Sharpe ratio(RpRf)/σp (R_p - R_f) / \sigma_p Total risk (standard deviation)
Treynor ratio(RpRf)/βp (R_p - R_f) / \beta_p Systematic risk (beta)
Jensen's alphaRp[Rf+βp(RmRf)] R_p - [R_f + \beta_p(R_m - R_f)] Return above CAPM
RAROCrisk-adjusted return / economic capitalEconomic (unexpected-loss) capital

ties profitability to the a business consumes, so a bank can compare a trading desk and a loan book on the same footing. A unit adds value when its RAROC exceeds the firm’s cost of equity.

Governance, Basel & Enterprise Risk

Sound governance puts the board and a chief risk officer over an independent risk function, with clear risk appetite and limits. At the system level, the set global bank-capital and liquidity rules. Know the :[3]

The three pillars of Basel II/III
PillarWhat it covers
Pillar 1 — Minimum capitalCapital requirements for credit, market & operational risk
Pillar 2 — Supervisory reviewRegulators assess a bank's own capital adequacy & risk management
Pillar 3 — Market disciplinePublic disclosure so the market can judge a bank's risk

The GARP Code of Conduct

All FRM holders and candidates agree to the GARP Code of Conduct, built on principles of professional integrity, conflict-of-interest avoidance, confidentiality, and professionalism. The exam tests it by scenario — recognizing which principle a risk professional has breached — much like other finance-ethics standards.

Checkpoint · Part I · 1 · Foundations

Question 1 of 10

In the capital asset pricing model, what does the beta of a security measure?

2 · Quantitative Analysis

20% of Part I. The statistics and probability behind every risk model — the payoff is far larger than the weight because VaR, credit models, and volatility estimation all sit on this toolkit. Focus on distributions, correlation, hypothesis testing, regression, and volatility models.

Probability & Distributions

Know the workhorses: the normal distribution (symmetric, defined by mean and variance; ~68/95/99% within one/two/three standard deviations), the lognormal (used for prices, which cannot go negative), the binomial, and the Student’s t (fatter tails, used for small samples). Real financial returns have fat tails and negative skew — losses cluster more than the normal predicts, which is exactly why tail-risk measures matter.

Mean, Variance & Correlation

Core statistics & risk measures
MeasureWhat it tells you
Standard deviationTotal volatility — dispersion of returns around the mean
Varianceσ2 \sigma^2 — the squared dispersion; standard deviation is its root
CovarianceDirection two variables move together (unscaled)
Correlationρ=σxy/(σxσy) \rho = \sigma_{xy} / (\sigma_x \sigma_y) — standardized, from −1 to +1
Skewness / kurtosisAsymmetry / fat tails versus the normal distribution

drives diversification: combining assets with correlation below 1 lowers portfolio standard deviation below the weighted average. The catch the FRM hammers home — correlations rise toward 1 in a crisis, so diversification fails just when it is needed. model the joint and tail behavior that simple linear correlation misses.

Hypothesis Testing & Regression

In hypothesis testing, a Type I error rejects a true null (its probability is the significance level, α) and a Type II error fails to reject a false null. Linear regression fits Y=b0+b1X+ε Y = b_0 + b_1 X + \varepsilon ; the slope b1 b_1 is the change in Y per unit of X, and R2 R^2 is the share of Y’s variation the model explains. Watch for the classic regression pitfalls — heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and multicollinearity.

Volatility, EWMA & GARCH

Volatility is not constant — it clusters (calm and turbulent periods bunch together). Two models capture this: weights recent returns more heavily via a decay factor (lambda), and adds mean reversion to a long-run variance. Both feed directly into VaR, so a question about a time-varying volatility estimate is usually pointing at one of these.

Checkpoint · Part I · 2 · Quantitative Analysis

Question 1 of 10

A random variable has a probability density function. What does integrating that density over the entire range of possible values always equal?

3 · Financial Markets & Products

30% of Part I — tied for the largest topic. The instruments themselves: interest rates and bonds, forwards, futures, swaps, and options, and how their risks behave. This is broad and heavily tested, so give it real time.

Interest Rates, Bonds & Duration

A bond’s price is the present value of its coupons plus par, discounted at the market yield. The single most-tested relationship is the inverse link between price and yield:[5]

Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions
Yield ↑Price ↓

Duration is the linear (first-order) estimate of this price change; convexity is the curvature correction for large rate moves.

measures price sensitivity to rates — longer maturity, lower coupon, and lower yield all raise it, and a zero-coupon bond’s duration equals its maturity. corrects duration’s straight-line estimate for large moves. A bond trades at a premium when its coupon exceeds the yield, at par when they match, and at a discount when the coupon is below.

What increases a bond's interest-rate risk (duration)
FeatureEffect on duration
Longer maturityHigher duration (more rate-sensitive)
Lower couponHigher duration
Lower yieldHigher duration
Zero couponDuration equals maturity (the maximum for the term)

Forwards, Futures & Swaps

A forward is a customized OTC agreement to trade later at a set price; a future is the standardized, exchange-traded version that is daily and backed by a clearinghouse, which sharply cuts . A swap exchanges cash-flow streams (classically fixed for floating interest) and behaves like a series of forwards. The cost-of-carry forward price of an asset with no income is F0=S0erT F_0 = S_0 \, e^{rT} .

Options & Their Payoffs

An option gives the right, not the obligation: a call to buy, a put to sell, at the strike. A long call profits when the underlying rises above strike plus premium; a long put profits when it falls below strike minus premium.

Combining options builds strategies (straddles, spreads, collars) the exam loves to test for their payoff diagrams. For European options, put-call parity links them: c+XerT=p+S0 c + X e^{-rT} = p + S_0 .

Derivatives Markets & Counterparties

Since the 2008 crisis, standardized OTC derivatives are increasingly pushed through central counterparties (CCPs) that net exposures and require margin, reducing systemic counterparty risk. Know the mitigants: netting agreements, collateral (margin), and central clearing. Exchange-traded futures already carry these protections; bilateral forwards do not.

Checkpoint · Part I · 3 · Financial Markets & Products

Question 1 of 10

A forward contract differs from a futures contract primarily because a forward is:

4 · Valuation & Risk Models

30% of Part I — tied for the largest topic, and the heart of the FRM.This is where the toolkit becomes risk numbers: VaR, expected shortfall, option pricing and the Greeks, and stress testing. Master this section and you own the credential’s core skill.

Value at Risk (VaR)

is the loss not expected to be exceeded over a horizon at a confidence level — for example, a 1-day 99% VaR. It is computed three ways:

Value at Risk (VaR) and expected shortfall on the loss distribution
VaR cutoffLoss tailLosses ←→ Gains

VaR is the loss you should not exceed at a confidence level (say 95%). Expected shortfall (ES) is the average loss in the tail beyond VaR — a coherent measure that captures tail severity.

Three ways to compute VaR
MethodHow it worksWatch out for
Parametric (variance–covariance)Assumes a distribution (usually normal); VaR from σ and a z-scoreUnderstates fat-tail / non-linear risk
Historical simulationRe-prices the portfolio over actual past returnsAssumes the past repeats; data-window sensitive
Monte Carlo simulationSimulates many random scenarios from a modelComputationally heavy; model-dependent

Expected Shortfall & Coherence

VaR’s flaw is that it ignores how bad the loss is beyond the cutoff. (conditional VaR) is the average loss in that tail, so it captures severity.

ES is a — it satisfies subadditivity (diversification never increases it), which VaR can violate. That is why Basel’s market-risk framework shifted from 99% VaR toward a 97.5% expected-shortfall measure.[4]

Black-Scholes-Merton & the Greeks

prices a European option from five inputs — underlying price, strike, time, the risk-free rate, and volatility — assuming lognormal prices and no arbitrage. is the only input you cannot observe directly. The are the model’s sensitivities and the language of hedging:

The option Greeks
GreekMeasures sensitivity toHedging use
DeltaA $1 move in the underlyingDelta-hedge with the underlying; rebalance as it changes
GammaHow fast delta itself changesLarge near the money; drives rebalancing frequency
VegaA change in volatilityLong options are long vega
ThetaThe passage of timeLong options are short theta (time decay)
RhoA change in interest ratesUsually the smallest Greek

Stress Testing & Model Risk

Because VaR is calibrated to normal conditions, complements it by estimating losses under severe but plausible scenarios — historical (re-run 2008) or hypothetical (a sovereign default).[7] Equally important is model risk: every number here depends on assumptions, and a model that is wrong or wrongly used can understate risk badly. Backtesting (comparing VaR to realized losses) is how you check a model is calibrated.

Checkpoint · Part I · 4 · Valuation & Risk Models

Question 1 of 10

Value at risk (VaR) at a 99% confidence level over one day is best interpreted as:

5 · Part II Overview — The 6 Risk Areas

Part II is 80 questions and applies the Part I toolkit to each major risk class. Below is a structured overview of all six areas and their weights so you can see the full path to the FRM charter. (Our free practice questions focus on Part I; this section maps what Part II adds.)[2]

FRM Part II exam weighting by topic (2026)
Market Risk Measurement & Management20% · 20%
Credit Risk Measurement & Management20% · 20%
Operational Risk & Resilience20% · 20%
Liquidity & Treasury Risk15% · 15%
Risk & Investment Management15% · 15%
Current Issues in Financial Markets10% · 10%

Market Risk Measurement & Management

20% of Part II. Goes deeper than Part I VaR: VaR mapping, the parametric and non-parametric approaches in detail, expected shortfall and other coherent measures, fixed-income and volatility risk, and the Basel market-risk capital rules (the move to ES).[4]

Credit Risk Measurement & Management

20% of Part II. The credit-loss building blocks and how to model them:

Expected credit loss = PD × LGD × EAD
PDProbability of defaultChance the counterparty defaults over the horizon.
LGDLoss given defaultFraction of exposure lost after recovery = 1 − recovery rate.
EADExposure at defaultAmount outstanding when default occurs.

Expected loss is priced into spreads; unexpected loss (the volatility around it) is what credit capital covers.

is × × , priced into spreads; capital covers . Part II adds credit scoring, structural and reduced-form default models, credit derivatives (CDS), counterparty credit risk, and credit VaR.

Operational Risk & Resilience

20% of Part II. — loss from failed processes, people, systems, or external events — plus modern operational resilience (cyber, third-party, business continuity). Governance runs on the :

The three lines of defense (operational-risk governance)
  1. 1st line · Business units / risk ownersOwn and manage the risks they take in day-to-day operations.
  2. 2nd line · Risk management & complianceSet the framework, set limits, and independently monitor & challenge.
  3. 3rd line · Internal auditProvides independent assurance that the first two lines work as intended.

Each line is independent of the one before it — a core governance model the FRM tests.

Part II covers loss-data modeling, the Basel Standardized Approach for operational-risk capital,[9] key risk indicators, scenario analysis, and stress/resilience testing.

Liquidity & Treasury Risk

15% of Part II. The distinction between and , liquidity-adjusted VaR, the Basel liquidity ratios ( and ),[8] funds-transfer pricing, and how liquidity spirals turn a market shock into a funding crisis.

Risk & Investment Management

15% of Part II.Portfolio risk from the manager’s seat: factor models, portfolio construction and risk budgeting, performance measurement (the Sharpe, Treynor, and information ratios), hedge-fund risk, and the risks of illiquid and alternative assets.

Current Issues in Financial Markets

10% of Part II. A rotating reading list of recent developments GARP judges every risk professional should know — for example, machine learning and AI in risk, climate risk, cyber risk, and the lessons of recent market events. Because it changes each cycle, study the current official readings rather than memorizing a fixed list.[2]

How to Use This Study Guide

A study guide is a map, not the whole territory — use it alongside the GARP curriculum and our practice tools, weighting your time toward the heaviest areas. The FRM is demanding and quantitative, so disciplined, spaced practice with worked problems is what separates a pass from a fail.

FRM Part I topics by 2026weight (highest → lowest)
Valuation & Risk Models
30%
Financial Markets & Products
30%
Foundations of Risk Management
20%
Quantitative Analysis
20%

Valuation & Risk Models and Financial Markets & Products together are 60% of Part I.

A study loop that actually works
  1. 1

    Read a topic here

    Work through one Part I topic at a time, heaviest first: Financial Markets & Products and Valuation & Risk Models.

  2. 2

    Take the checkpoint

    The quick check at the end of each Part I topic exposes what didn't stick.

  3. 3

    Drill the gaps

    Send your weak topic straight into the free practice questions and flashcards.

  4. 4

    Space it out

    Come back over weeks. Roughly 200–240 hours of spaced practice per part beats one long cram.

FRM Concept Questions

Common FRM concepts the exam tests — across every Part I topic plus the major Part II risks. Tap any card for a short, exam-ready answer backed by an official source (GARP, the Basel Committee, the SEC, the Federal Reserve), then test yourself on them as flashcards.

FRM Glossary

Quick definitions for the terms you’ll see most across the FRM exam:

Basel Accords
International bank-capital and liquidity standards from the Basel Committee. Basel III added higher-quality capital, a leverage ratio, and liquidity ratios (LCR, NSFR).
Beta
A measure of an asset's systematic (market) risk. The market portfolio's beta is 1.0; a beta above 1 means greater systematic risk.
Black-Scholes-Merton
A model that prices a European option from the underlying price, strike, time, risk-free rate, and volatility, assuming lognormal prices and no arbitrage.
CAPM
Capital Asset Pricing Model — required return = risk-free rate + beta × (market return − risk-free rate). Prices only systematic risk.
Coherent risk measure
A risk measure satisfying monotonicity, subadditivity, positive homogeneity, and translation invariance. Expected shortfall is coherent; VaR is not always subadditive.
Convexity
The curvature of the bond price–yield relationship; it corrects duration's straight-line estimate for large rate changes and is always positive for option-free bonds.
Copula
A function that links marginal distributions into a joint distribution, used to model the joint default behavior and tail dependence that linear correlation misses.
Correlation
A standardized measure of co-movement between two variables, from −1 to +1. It drives diversification and rises toward 1 in crises.
Counterparty credit risk
The risk that the other side of a derivative or trade defaults before settling its obligations; mitigated by netting, collateral, and central clearing.
Delta
The change in an option's value for a $1 move in the underlying. Delta-hedging neutralizes small price moves; it must be rebalanced as delta changes (gamma).
Duration
A bond's price sensitivity to interest-rate changes, in years. Longer maturity, lower coupon, and lower yield all increase duration; a first-order (linear) estimate of price change.
Economic capital
The capital a firm estimates it needs to absorb unexpected losses to a chosen confidence level over a horizon, based on its own risk models.
EWMA
Exponentially weighted moving average — a volatility estimate that puts more weight on recent observations via a decay factor (lambda).
Expected loss
The average anticipated credit loss, PD × LGD × EAD. It is priced into spreads and provisions, not held against capital.
Expected shortfall (ES)
The average loss given that the loss exceeds VaR; also called conditional VaR. A coherent risk measure that captures tail severity, which VaR ignores.
Exposure at default (EAD)
The amount outstanding to a counterparty at the moment it defaults; the third input to expected loss (PD × LGD × EAD).
Funding liquidity risk
The risk a firm cannot meet cash obligations as they fall due without unacceptable loss.
GARCH
A model (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) that estimates time-varying volatility, capturing volatility clustering in returns.
Hedging
Taking an offsetting position to reduce exposure to a risk factor — for example, shorting futures to protect a long cash position.
Implied volatility
The volatility that makes a model price equal the option's market price; the only Black-Scholes input not directly observable.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
A Basel III ratio requiring banks to hold enough high-quality liquid assets to survive a 30-day stress of net cash outflows.
Loss given default (LGD)
The fraction of an exposure a lender loses if the counterparty defaults, equal to one minus the recovery rate.
Market liquidity risk
The risk a position cannot be sold quickly without significantly moving its price.
Marking to market
Revaluing a position to its current market price; exchange-traded futures are marked to market daily, which limits counterparty risk.
Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
A Basel III ratio requiring available stable funding to meet required stable funding over a one-year horizon, limiting reliance on short-term wholesale funding.
Operational risk
Loss from failed internal processes, people, and systems, or external events; includes legal risk but excludes strategic and reputational risk.
Probability of default (PD)
The likelihood that a borrower or counterparty fails to meet its obligations over a stated horizon. A key input to expected credit loss.
RAROC
Risk-adjusted return on capital — risk-adjusted return divided by economic capital; a business adds value when its RAROC exceeds the cost of equity.
Stress testing
Estimating losses under severe but plausible scenarios (historical or hypothetical) to probe tail events that VaR, calibrated to normal conditions, can miss.
Systematic risk
Non-diversifiable, market-wide risk measured by beta. It is the only risk the market rewards with higher expected return.
The Greeks
An option's price sensitivities — delta (underlying), gamma (delta's change), vega (volatility), theta (time), and rho (rates) — used to hedge.
Three lines of defense
An operational-risk governance model: 1st line = business/risk owners, 2nd line = risk management & compliance, 3rd line = independent internal audit.
Three pillars (Basel)
Pillar 1 — minimum capital for credit, market & operational risk; Pillar 2 — supervisory review; Pillar 3 — market discipline through disclosure.
Unexpected loss
The volatility of credit losses around the expected loss; economic and regulatory capital is sized to absorb it up to a high confidence level.
Unsystematic risk
Company- or industry-specific risk that diversification can largely eliminate; it is not rewarded with extra return.
Value at Risk (VaR)
An estimate of the maximum loss not expected to be exceeded over a set horizon at a given confidence level. A 1-day 99% VaR of 1Mmeanslossesshouldexceed1M means losses should exceed 1M only ~1% of days.

Free FRM Study Materials & Resources

Everything you need to prepare for the FRM exam is free here — no paywall, no sign-up. This guide is the foundation; pair it with the rest of our free FRM study materials for active recall, timed practice, and last-minute review:

  • FRM Practice Test — exam-style questions across the Part I topics, with explanations.
  • FRM Flashcards — active-recall decks for the high-yield formulas, risk models, and concepts.

FRM Study Guide FAQ

FRM Part I has 100 multiple-choice questions and FRM Part II has 80 multiple-choice questions. Each part is a separate 4-hour exam. You must pass Part I before your Part II result is graded and credited.

References

  1. 1.Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP). “Financial Risk Manager (FRM) Certification.” GARP.
  2. 2.Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP). “FRM Exam — Study Materials & Learning Objectives.” GARP.
  3. 3.Bank for International Settlements. “Basel III: international regulatory framework for banks.” BIS / Basel Committee.
  4. 4.Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. “Minimum capital requirements for market risk.” Bank for International Settlements.
  5. 5.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Interest Rate Risk — When Interest Rates Go Up, Prices of Fixed-Rate Bonds Fall.” SEC.gov.
  6. 6.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Diversification — Investor.gov.” Investor.gov.
  7. 7.Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. “Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests.” Federal Reserve.
  8. 8.Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. “Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools.” Bank for International Settlements.
  9. 9.Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. “Operational risk — Standardised Approach (Basel III finalisation).” Bank for International Settlements.
  10. 10.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Assessing Your Risk Tolerance — Investor.gov.” Investor.gov.

Sources for the concept answers

Every answer in the FRM concept questions above is drawn from an official primary source:

  1. Bank for International Settlements / Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. “An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions.” Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
  2. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Derivatives — Investor.gov.” Investor.gov / SEC.
Career Employer

Career Employer is the ultimate resource to help you get started working the job of your dreams. We cover topics from general career information, career searching, exam preparation with free study materials, career interviewing, and becoming successful in your career of choice.

Follow Us:

All Posts

Career Employer’s Editorial Process

Here at Career Employer, we focus a lot on providing factually accurate information that is always up to date. We strive to provide correct information using strict editorial processes, article editing, and fact-checking for all of the information found on our website. We only utilize trustworthy and relevant resources. To find out more, make sure to read our full editorial process page here.