This free CPACE study guide teaches the school-leadership knowledge and applied judgment the California Preliminary Administrative Credential Examination tests, organized to the six leadership domains and the that anchor them.[1] Passing the CPACE earns California’s .
It’s interactive, not a wall of text: every module has built-in checkpoint quizzes, flashcards, and practice questions, so you learn educational leadership by doing — not just reading. This guide covers ; the separate written performance assessment is taken on its own.
What the CPACE Is
The CPACE is owned by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) and administered through Pearson’s Evaluation Systems.[1] It has two subtests.
This guide teaches CPACE-Content (Test Code 603): 70 selected-response (multiple-choice) questions and 3 focused constructed-response assignments, with about 3 hours and 15 minutes of testing time. The separate CPACE-Performance (604) is a written performance assessment.
The single most useful thing to know before you study: the exam tests leadership practice, not just leadership facts. Most items are scenario-based and ask what a competent administrator would do— and the right answer almost always develops people rather than directs or punishes, is driven by data and equity, follows law and due process, and puts student safety and welfare first.
- 1
70 selected-response (multiple-choice) questions
Scenario-based items that test direct knowledge of school leadership and your ability to apply it — analyze a problem, choose the best leadership action, and recognize the right considerations.
- 2
3 focused constructed-response assignments
Short written responses to a school-related problem. You explain the appropriate strategies and considerations a competent administrator would weigh — judged on knowledge applied, not writing flourish.
- 3
Scored together on a 100–300 scale
Selected-response and constructed-response performance combine into one CPACE-Content subtest score; 220 is the passing scaled score.
- 4
CPACE-Performance (separate subtest)
A distinct written performance assessment — two modules analyzing a teaching video and school exhibits — taken and passed separately from CPACE-Content.
One naming note worth keeping straight: the CPACE earns the Preliminary Administrative Services Credential. The credential is later cleared to a Clear credential through an approved induction program — passing the CPACE is the start of the administrative-credential path, not the whole of it.[3]
CPACE Exam Snapshot
| Detail | CPACE-Content (Test Code 603) |
|---|---|
| Credential | California Preliminary Administrative Services Credential |
| Owner / administrator | California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) via Pearson Evaluation Systems |
| Questions | 70 selected-response (multiple-choice) + 3 constructed-response assignments |
| Time | About 3 hours 15 minutes (plus tutorial) |
| Delivery | Computer-based at a Pearson VUE test center |
| Scoring | Scaled score on a 100–300 range; 220 required to pass |
| Result | Pass / Fail; both CPACE-Content and CPACE-Performance must be passed |
| Domains | Six leadership content domains anchored in the six CPSEL standards |
CPACE-Content covers six leadership content domains.[1] They map to the six standards and carry roughly comparable weight, so a balanced plan across all six is the safest approach — with the largest share of items in the instruction-focused domains:
Standard 1
Development and Implementation of a Shared Vision
Facilitate a shared, equity-focused vision of learning and shape every decision, resource, and routine around it.
Standard 2
Instructional Leadership
Build a coherent system of curriculum, instruction, and assessment grounded in data and high expectations for all students.
Standard 3
Management and Learning Environment
Manage the organization, operations, budget, safety, and resources so they support teaching and learning.
Standard 4
Family and Community Engagement
Engage families and the community as partners and steward equitable relationships with diverse stakeholders.
Standard 5
Ethics and Integrity
Act ethically and with integrity, model professional norms, and make decisions in the best interest of every student.
Standard 6
External Context and Policy
Understand and respond to the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context affecting schools.
Module 1 · Visionary Leadership
One content domain — anchored in CPSEL Standard 1. Effective leaders develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of learning and growth for every student. This domain is the “why” behind every other — the vision the whole school is organized to achieve.
1.1 Developing a Shared Vision
A is built with stakeholders, not imposed from the office. The leader engages teachers, families, students, and community members in co-creating it, grounded in and in data on current performance and needs.[2] That collaborative process is what creates the buy-in a vision needs to actually change daily practice — a vision people helped build is one they will work to achieve.
- 1
Develop collaboratively
Build the vision WITH stakeholders — students, families, staff, and community — using data on current performance and needs, so it is shared rather than imposed.
- 2
Articulate clearly
Communicate the vision in plain, compelling language across multiple channels and audiences so everyone understands the 'why' and their part in it.
- 3
Implement and align
Translate the vision into goals, resources, schedules, and daily practices; align budget, staffing, and programs so structures reinforce — not contradict — the vision.
- 4
Steward and monitor
Keep the vision alive: monitor progress with data, celebrate wins, adjust strategy, and protect the vision through turnover and competing demands.
1.2 Articulating & Implementing the Vision
Once developed, the vision must be communicated clearly across many channels and audiences and then implemented through alignment: goals, budget, schedules, staffing, and programs are organized so structures reinforce the vision rather than contradict it. When a new policy or initiative is proposed, the leader’s test is whether it advances the shared vision.
1.3 Data, Equity & Stewarding the Vision
A vision is only real if it is monitored and sustained. The leader tracks progress with multiple measures, celebrates wins, adjusts strategy, and protects the vision through staff turnover and competing demands. Throughout, stays central: the vision frames success for every student, and disaggregated data keeps subgroup gaps from hiding behind averages.[6]
Checkpoint · Visionary Leadership
Question 1 of 8
In the context of setting a vision for a high school, which stakeholder group's input is crucial to include during the initial planning stages?
Module 2 · Instructional Leadership
One content domain — anchored in CPSEL Standard 2. This is the highest-leverage domain because student learning is the point of every other function. The leader builds a coherent standards-aligned instructional system and improves teaching directly through supervision, feedback, and support.
2.1 A Coherent Instructional System
starts with a clear focus: curriculum, instruction, and assessment aligned to state standards and to the school’s vision, with high expectations for every student.[2] New programs and technology are adopted only when they advance learning goals — the leader develops a plan with teachers that ties any new initiative to standards and curriculum rather than chasing novelty.
2.2 Supervision, Feedback & MTSS
The leader improves teaching through a continuous : set the focus, observe classrooms with frequent to gather objective evidence, give timely, specific, growth-oriented feedback, connect it to job-embedded support, and monitor impact with data. The aim is to build teacher capacity, not to catch and rank.
- 1
Set the instructional focus
Anchor curriculum, instruction, and assessment to standards and to the school's vision and data — define what good teaching looks like before you go looking for it.
- 2
Observe and collect evidence
Use frequent classroom observations and walk-throughs to gather objective evidence of practice, not impressions — what teachers and students are actually doing.
- 3
Give actionable feedback
Deliver timely, specific, growth-oriented feedback in a coaching stance; name a strength and a single high-leverage next step rather than a long list.
- 4
Support with professional learning
Connect feedback to job-embedded support — coaching, PLCs, modeling, targeted PD — so teachers can act on it; build collective capacity, not compliance.
- 5
Monitor impact with data
Check whether instruction and student learning improved using formative and summative data, then cycle back — supervision is continuous, not an annual event.
To meet the range of student needs, leaders use a : strong for all, targeted Tier 2 support for some, and intensive Tier 3 intervention for a few, with as its academic strand.[4] MTSS is proactive and data-driven — it catches needs early instead of waiting for failure.
| Tier | Who | What it provides |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Universal) | All students | High-quality, standards-aligned core instruction and supports |
| Tier 2 (Targeted) | Some students | Supplemental, small-group support for students who need more |
| Tier 3 (Intensive) | A few students | Intensive, individualized intervention for the highest needs |
Checkpoint · Instructional Leadership
Question 1 of 8
How should a school leader address resistance from teachers regarding a new instructional technology?
Module 3 · School Improvement Leadership
One content domain — drawing on CPSEL Standards 2 and 3. Here leadership becomes systematic change: using data to find the real problem, building a positive collaborative culture, and closing the gaps that hold student groups back.
3.1 The Continuous Improvement Cycle
School improvement runs on a : analyze multiple data sources to identify a , name and set measurable goals, plan and implement evidence-based strategies, then monitor and adjust.[6] The discipline is treating the root cause, not the symptom — and triangulating multiple sources of data before naming a priority.
- 1
Analyze data & identify the problem
Use multiple measures — achievement, attendance, discipline, climate, subgroup gaps — to find the real problem of practice, not just a symptom.
- 2
Set measurable goals & root causes
Name root causes and write specific, measurable, time-bound improvement goals tied to those causes and to equity for underserved students.
- 3
Plan & implement strategies
Choose evidence-based strategies, allocate resources, build a clear plan with owners and timelines, and create the structures (PLCs, RTI/MTSS) to carry it out.
- 4
Monitor & evaluate; adjust
Track leading and lagging indicators, evaluate whether the change is working, and revise — continuous improvement is a loop, not a one-time plan.
3.2 Culture, Climate & Closing Gaps
Improvement needs a that supports it. Leaders build positive culture by setting shared norms and high expectations, creating structured opportunities for staff to collaborate, modeling trust and respect, and addressing problems fairly — structured collaboration on real work changes culture more than one-off social events.
Central to this domain is closing the and the beneath it. Leaders disaggregate data to see how each group is doing, then target evidence-based interventions — tutoring, MTSS, expanded learning — to the students furthest from opportunity, monitoring subgroup progress over time.[6] means giving each student what they need, not identical treatment.
Checkpoint · School Improvement Leadership
Question 1 of 8
When attempting to shift school culture towards more collaborative practices, what strategy should a school leader prioritize?
Module 4 · Professional Learning & Growth Leadership
One content domain — drawing on CPSEL Standards 2 and 5. A leader’s impact multiplies through people. This domain is about growing teachers and staff — and oneself — so capacity and improvement outlast any single administrator.
4.1 Effective Professional Learning
Effective is ongoing, collaborative, job-embedded, and data-driven, tied to school goals and to evidence about student learning, and differentiated to teacher and school needs.[2] A one-off workshop disconnected from daily practice rarely changes anything; sustained, in-context learning does.
Professional learning communities (PLCs)
Teams of educators who collaboratively examine student work and data, share practice, and own results together — collective, ongoing, job-embedded learning.
Instructional coaching
One-on-one, non-evaluative support that models, observes, and gives feedback so a teacher can act on a specific growth goal.
Mentoring / induction
Pairing new teachers with experienced mentors (e.g., California's induction) to support, retain, and develop early-career educators.
Differentiated, job-embedded PD
Professional development matched to individual and school needs and woven into the workday — not a one-off workshop disconnected from practice.
Self-reflection & growth goals
Educators set evidence-based professional goals, reflect on practice, and pursue continuous improvement; the leader models it too.
Distributed leadership
Growing teacher-leaders and shared leadership structures builds capacity and sustains improvement beyond any single administrator.
4.2 Coaching, PLCs & New-Teacher Support
The leader builds structures for adult learning: where teams examine student work and data and own results together; that supports a specific growth goal; and strong to support and retain new teachers.[3] grows teacher-leaders so improvement is sustainable.
Checkpoint · Professional Learning & Growth Leadership
Question 1 of 8
How should a school leader proceed when they notice that the vision to improve reading literacy lacks momentum among younger teachers?
Module 5 · Organizational & Systems Leadership
One content domain — anchored in CPSEL Standard 3. Management is a means to instruction, not an end. Leaders run operations, safety, budget, and human resources as a coherent system aligned to the vision — and they must know the law.
5.1 Systems, Operations & Safety
means aligning structures, resources, and processes toward the vision rather than reacting to isolated incidents.[2] Leaders use to improve information and buy-in, plan major changes in phases with pilots and feedback loops, and maintain a safe, orderly environment — including a current . When a choice affects student safety, it generally takes priority over operational convenience.
5.2 Budget, LCFF/LCAP & School Law
California funds schools through the , which directs more resources to high-need students through base, supplemental, and concentration grants; the is the three-year plan tying spending to goals and stakeholder input.[5] Leaders align budget to student need and the vision and make transparent, data-informed decisions — resource allocation is an equity tool.
School leaders must also know the law. protects student-record privacy and governs disclosure;[7] and guarantee services and accommodations for students with disabilities; and are entitled to identification, designated and integrated instruction, and reclassification. As a , a leader must report reasonable suspicion of child abuse or neglect — a duty that overrides ordinary confidentiality.[8]
| Law / framework | What a leader must do |
|---|---|
| LCFF / LCAP | Direct resources to high-need students; tie spending to measurable goals and stakeholder input |
| FERPA | Protect student-record privacy; follow disclosure rules and parents'/eligible students' access rights |
| IDEA / Section 504 | Ensure a free appropriate public education through valid IEPs and 504 accommodations |
| English learner services | Identify, serve, and reclassify ELs; provide required parent committees and access |
| CANRA (mandated reporting) | Report reasonable suspicion of child abuse/neglect promptly; the duty cannot be delegated |
- Student safety & welfare first. When choices compete, the answer almost always protects the safety, rights, and best interest of students — the leader's paramount duty.
- Equity & nondiscrimination. Comply with civil-rights law and provide equitable access — IDEA/special education, Section 504, English-learner services, Title IX.
- Mandated reporting. Suspected child abuse or neglect must be reported under California law (CANRA); this duty overrides ordinary confidentiality.
- Due process & FERPA. Follow due-process and discipline procedures and protect student-record privacy under FERPA before acting.
- Acting alone outside policy. Bypassing law, board policy, or due process — even with good intentions — is high-risk; consult counsel/supervisor and document.
- Personal interest over students. Conflicts of interest, favoritism, or convenience that put adults' interests ahead of students' is an ethics-violation trap.
Checkpoint · Organizational & Systems Leadership
Question 1 of 8
In the context of systems thinking in school leadership, which action best exemplifies leveraging interdependence among staff?
Module 6 · Community Leadership
One content domain — drawing on CPSEL Standards 4 and 6. Schools don’t exist in isolation. Leaders partner with families and the community and respond to the broader political, legal, and cultural context surrounding the school.
6.1 Family & Community Engagement
treats families as genuine partners — linked to better attendance, behavior, and achievement.[2] Leaders build two-way, culturally responsive relationships, remove barriers to participation, and bring community assets — businesses, agencies, organizations — into the work of supporting students, through advisory committees, forums, internships, and partnerships.
6.2 Diverse Communities & External Context
Leaders engage culturally and linguistically diverse communities by communicating in families’ home languages, honoring cultural assets, and creating structures — advisory committees that reflect the community, and required English-learner parent committees — that let all families participate meaningfully.[1] They also respond to the school’s : district policy, state and federal law, funding, and community values, advocating for students while buffering staff from external noise.
Checkpoint · Community Leadership
Question 1 of 8
A school leader is aiming to improve parental involvement in a culturally diverse school community. What strategy would be most effective in achieving this goal?
How to Use This CPACE Study Guide
This guide is built to be worked, not just read. Because CPACE-Content tests applied leadership judgment, the most efficient path to a pass is to learn the material and the way a competent administrator thinks:
- Cover all six domains. They’re weighted comparably, so a balanced plan beats overloading one domain — and the same CPSEL throughlines recur across all six.
- Learn the throughlines. Shared vision, data-driven and equity-centered decisions, developing people over directing them, and lawful, ethical practice answer most scenario items.
- Think like an administrator. On a scenario, ask: what does a competent, ethical leader do here? Usually develop capacity, use data, follow due process, and protect students first.
- Master the high-yield specifics. CPSEL, MTSS/RTI, LCFF/LCAP, FERPA, IDEA/Section 504, EL services, and mandated reporting recur constantly.
- Check off as you go. Use the Study Guide Contents to mark each section done — it raises your exam-readiness score.
- Take every checkpoint. The end-of-module quizzes show exactly which domains need another pass.
- Then prove it. Send your weak area into the flashcards and a practice test, and read every rationale — that is how the knowledge sticks.
CPACE Concept Questions
Common leadership concepts candidates search while studying for the CPACE-Content exam — each answered briefly and backed by an official source. Test yourself, then drill them as flashcards.
CPACE Glossary
The high-yield CPACE terms in one place — hover any dotted term in the guide, or flip the whole deck here as a self-grading flashcard set.
- Achievement gap
- A persistent disparity in academic outcomes between student groups, surfaced by disaggregating data and addressed through equity-focused strategies.
- California School Dashboard
- The state's multiple-measure accountability and continuous-improvement reporting tool, including disaggregated student-group results.
- Comprehensive School Safety Plan
- A required California plan covering emergency procedures, climate, and prevention to maintain a safe learning environment.
- Constructed-response assignment
- A focused written response to a school-related problem on CPACE-Content, scored on the strategies and considerations a competent administrator would apply.
- Continuous improvement cycle
- A repeating loop — analyze data, set goals and find root causes, plan and implement strategies, then monitor and adjust.
- CPACE
- The California Preliminary Administrative Credential Examination — the assessment used to earn California's Preliminary Administrative Services Credential.
- CPACE-Content
- CPACE Test Code 603 — 70 selected-response questions plus 3 constructed-response assignments testing the six leadership content domains; 220 to pass.
- CPACE-Performance
- CPACE Test Code 604 — a separate written performance assessment in which the candidate analyzes a teaching video and school exhibits.
- CPSEL
- The California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders — the six standards that define effective school leadership and anchor the CPACE blueprint.
- CTC
- The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing — the state agency that issues credentials and owns the CPACE.
- Distributed leadership
- Building teacher-leaders and shared leadership structures so capacity and improvement outlive any single administrator.
- English learner (EL)
- A student whose home language is other than English who is identified for and entitled to designated and integrated language instruction.
- Equity
- Ensuring each student receives the resources, access, and supports they need to succeed — not identical treatment for all.
- External context
- The political, social, economic, legal, and cultural environment a leader must understand and respond to (CPSEL Standard 6).
- Family and community engagement
- Treating families and community as genuine, reciprocal partners in education, linked to better student outcomes (CPSEL Standard 4).
- FERPA
- The federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act protecting the privacy of student education records and governing their disclosure.
- IDEA
- The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, guaranteeing students with disabilities a free appropriate public education through the IEP process.
- Instructional coaching
- One-on-one, non-evaluative support that models, observes, and gives feedback so a teacher can act on a specific growth goal.
- Instructional leadership
- The principal's direct work to improve teaching and learning: a coherent standards-aligned system of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with high expectations for all.
- LCAP (Local Control and Accountability Plan)
- The three-year plan describing a district's goals, actions, and spending, including how it serves high-need students.
- LCFF (Local Control Funding Formula)
- California's funding system providing base, supplemental, and concentration grants to direct more resources to high-need students.
- Mandated reporter
- Under California's CANRA, school personnel who must report reasonable suspicion of child abuse or neglect; the duty overrides ordinary confidentiality.
- MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Supports)
- A coherent framework aligning academic, behavioral, and social-emotional supports across three tiers of increasing intensity.
- Opportunity gap
- Disparities in access, resources, and conditions that often drive the visible achievement gap; closing it means giving students what each needs.
- Participative decision-making
- Engaging staff and stakeholders in decisions to improve information, build buy-in, and strengthen implementation.
- Preliminary Administrative Services Credential
- California's entry-level administrator credential, authorizing service as a principal, vice principal, or other school administrator.
- Problem of practice
- The specific, evidence-based instructional or organizational problem a school chooses to address in its improvement work.
- Professional development
- Ongoing, collaborative, job-embedded, data-driven learning tied to school goals — not a one-off workshop disconnected from practice.
- Professional learning community (PLC)
- A team of educators who regularly examine student work and data, share practice, and take collective responsibility for results.
- Response to Intervention (RTI)
- The academic strand within MTSS — tiered, data-driven intervention that identifies and addresses learning needs early.
- Root cause analysis
- Identifying the underlying cause of a problem of practice rather than reacting to a symptom, so strategies target the right issue.
- School culture
- The shared norms, values, and behaviors of a school community, shaped by consistent systems, modeled behavior, and structured collaboration.
- Section 504
- The civil-rights provision requiring accommodations so students with disabilities have equal access to education.
- Selected-response question
- A multiple-choice item; CPACE-Content includes 70, often scenario-based, testing the application of leadership knowledge.
- Shared vision
- A collaboratively developed picture of learning that staff, students, families, and community helped shape and commit to — the foundation of CPSEL Standard 1.
- Supervision cycle
- The continuous loop of setting a focus, observing, giving growth-oriented feedback, supporting with professional learning, and monitoring impact with data.
- Systems thinking
- Leading by aligning structures, resources, and processes toward the vision, rather than reacting to isolated incidents.
- Teacher induction
- California's structured support and mentoring for new teachers that develops and retains them and clears the preliminary credential.
- Tier 1 instruction
- Universal, high-quality, standards-aligned instruction provided to all students; strong Tier 1 reduces the need for higher tiers.
- Walkthrough
- A brief, frequent classroom observation that gathers objective evidence of instructional practice to inform feedback and support.
CPACE Study Guide FAQ
CPACE stands for the California Preliminary Administrative Credential Examination. It is owned by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) and administered through Pearson's Evaluation Systems. Candidates pass it to earn California's Preliminary Administrative Services Credential, which authorizes service as a principal, vice principal, or other school administrator. It has two subtests: CPACE-Content and CPACE-Performance.
CPACE-Content includes 70 selected-response (multiple-choice) questions and 3 focused constructed-response assignments, with about 3 hours and 15 minutes of testing time. The multiple-choice items are largely scenario-based, testing your ability to apply leadership knowledge, and the constructed-response assignments ask you to explain appropriate strategies and considerations for a school-related problem.
Each CPACE subtest is reported on a scaled score range of 100 to 300, and you need a scaled score of 220 to pass. The selected-response and constructed-response portions of CPACE-Content combine into one subtest score. You must pass both CPACE-Content and CPACE-Performance to earn the credential, but they can be passed separately.
CPACE-Content covers six leadership content domains anchored in the California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (CPSEL): Visionary Leadership, Instructional Leadership, School Improvement Leadership, Professional Learning and Growth Leadership, Organizational and Systems Leadership, and Community Leadership. Together they operationalize the six CPSEL standards into the daily practice of a school administrator.
CPACE-Content (Test Code 603) is the knowledge-and-application subtest — selected-response questions and constructed-response assignments across the six leadership domains. CPACE-Performance (Test Code 604) is a separate written performance assessment in which you analyze a video-recorded teaching segment and a set of school exhibits and write your analysis. This study guide focuses on CPACE-Content.
Study by the leadership domains and, above all, by how a competent administrator acts. Most items are scenario-based, so learn to recognize the best leadership action: develop people rather than direct or punish, use data and equity to drive decisions, follow law and policy and due process, and put student safety and welfare first. Master CPSEL, MTSS, LCFF/LCAP, FERPA, and mandated reporting.
Yes — the full guide, the module checkpoints, the glossary, the practice test, and the flashcards are 100% free, with no account required.
References
- 1.California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC). “CPACE — California Preliminary Administrative Credential Examination (Content & Performance).” ctcexams.nesinc.com. ↑
- 2.California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC). “California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (CPSEL).” ctc.ca.gov. ↑
- 3.California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC). “Administrative Services Credential (Leaflet CL-574B).” ctc.ca.gov. ↑
- 4.California Department of Education (CDE). “California Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS).” cde.ca.gov. ↑
- 5.California Department of Education (CDE). “Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and LCAP.” cde.ca.gov. ↑
- 6.California Department of Education (CDE). “California School Dashboard and Accountability Model.” cde.ca.gov. ↑
- 7.U.S. Department of Education. “Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).” studentprivacy.ed.gov. ↑
- 8.State of California. “Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (CANRA), Penal Code §11164 et seq..” leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. ↑
- 100.California Department of Education (CDE). “English Learners — Parent and Community Engagement.” cde.ca.gov, accessed 20 June 2026. ↑
- 101.California Department of Education (CDE). “Special Education and English Learner Services in California.” cde.ca.gov, accessed 20 June 2026. ↑
Career Employer
Career Employer is the ultimate resource to help you get started working the job of your dreams. We cover topics from general career information, career searching, exam preparation with free study materials, career interviewing, and becoming successful in your career of choice.
All PostsCareer Employer’s Editorial Process
Here at Career Employer, we focus a lot on providing factually accurate information that is always up to date. We strive to provide correct information using strict editorial processes, article editing, and fact-checking for all of the information found on our website. We only utilize trustworthy and relevant resources. To find out more, make sure to read our full editorial process page here.