- Deductive reasoning?
- Reasoning from general premises to a conclusion that MUST be true if the premises are true. The Logic-Based Reasoning section is deductive.
- Inductive reasoning?
- Reasoning from specific observations to a likely (not guaranteed) general rule. Probable, not certain.
- Valid conclusion?
- One that must be true whenever the premises are true — judged on structure, not real-world truth.
- Validity vs. truth?
- Validity = the conclusion must follow from the premises. Truth = it matches the real world. The logic section tests validity.
- Modus ponens?
- Valid form: 'If P then Q' + 'P is true' → 'Q is true.'
- Modus tollens?
- Valid form: 'If P then Q' + 'Q is false' → 'P is false.'
- Affirming the consequent?
- INVALID: 'If P then Q' + 'Q is true' → 'P is true.' Runs the if-then rule backward.
- Denying the antecedent?
- INVALID: 'If P then Q' + 'P is false' → 'Q is false.' Also reverses the conditional wrongly.
- What does 'some' mean in logic?
- 'At least one' — and it is consistent with 'all.' 'Some tips were anonymous' allows that all were.
- What does 'all A are B' let you conclude?
- Only that A's are B's — NOT that all B's are A's. Reversing a one-way 'all' statement is invalid.
- What does 'no A are B' let you conclude?
- Also 'no B are A' (it's symmetric). If no document in the queue is released, nothing released is in the queue.
- Can you use outside knowledge on the logic section?
- No. Use ONLY the information stated in the paragraph; set aside facts you know from experience unless the premise states them.
- Converse of 'If P then Q'?
- 'If Q then P' — NOT logically equivalent. Assuming the converse is a common error.
- Contrapositive of 'If P then Q'?
- 'If not Q then not P' — this IS logically equivalent and always valid.
- Premise vs. conclusion?
- A premise is a given statement; the conclusion is what's claimed to follow. You judge whether the conclusion follows from the premises.
- Syllogism?
- An argument with two premises and a conclusion (e.g., All A are B; all B are C; therefore all A are C).
- How to test a logic conclusion?
- Ask: could this be false while every premise stays true? If yes, it does NOT follow.
- Why do wrong logic answers 'sound reasonable'?
- They're plausible in the real world but aren't forced by the premises. Plausible ≠ valid.
- 'Some A are B' → what can you conclude?
- Validly: 'Some B are A.' Nothing about the A's or B's that are NOT in the overlap.
- Counterexample (logic)?
- A case where the premises are true but the conclusion is false — it proves an argument invalid.
- Chaining conditionals?
- 'If P then Q' + 'If Q then R' → 'If P then R.' Valid hypothetical syllogism.
- Necessary vs. sufficient condition?
- Sufficient: if it holds, the result follows. Necessary: the result can't hold without it. They're not interchangeable.
- Quantifier 'every' / 'each'?
- Universal and singular — 'each officer files a report' applies to all of them, one at a time.
- Best timing strategy on logic items?
- Read premises carefully, answer quick items first, and don't sink all your time into one hard problem.
- Most common logic-item error?
- Misreading a quantifier ('all,' 'some,' 'no') or running an if-then rule backward.
- Figural reasoning?
- Abstract, non-verbal pattern reasoning using shapes only — no words or numbers — to measure pattern skill independent of reading/math.
- Rotation (figural)?
- The figure turns around a point by a fixed angle each step (e.g., 90° clockwise), keeping its shape.
- Reflection (figural)?
- The figure flips across an axis into its mirror image; every element swaps to the opposite side.
- Rotation vs. reflection — how to tell?
- Track one feature (an arrow tip or notch): a mirror image reverses left/right, a rotation does not.
- Figural series?
- A row of figures that change by a consistent rule; you predict the next figure.
- Figural analogy?
- 'A is to B as C is to ?' — find the transformation from A to B, then apply it to C.
- Figural matrix?
- A 3×3 grid with one cell missing; solve the row rule AND the column rule to find the missing figure.
- How to solve a figural matrix?
- Work the rule across each row and down each column; the answer satisfies BOTH rules.
- Polygon side-count rule?
- Sides increase or decrease each step (hexagon → pentagon → square → triangle).
- Element add/remove rule?
- One element is added or removed each step (1 dot → 2 dots → 3 dots → 4 dots).
- Shading/fill rule?
- Color or shading changes on a schedule (empty → half-shaded → full).
- Combined-rule figural items?
- Two attributes change at once (rotate AND grow) — track each change separately and apply both.
- Why no words or numbers on figural items?
- To isolate pure pattern reasoning so it's measured independently of reading or math ability.
- Net-folding (figural)?
- Mentally fold a flat 2-D pattern into a 3-D shape (like a cube) to see which figure results — spatial reasoning.
- Counting strategy on figural items?
- Confirm the count of elements changes by the same amount each step before committing to it.
- Attributes to scan in a figural item?
- Rotation, reflection, count of elements, number of sides, shading, size, and position.
- If two options fit the row rule?
- Use the column rule to decide between them in a matrix.
- 90° clockwise vs. counterclockwise?
- Clockwise turns toward the right; counterclockwise toward the left. Track the same point each frame.
- How many degrees in three 90° turns?
- 270° — three consecutive 90° rotations in the same direction.
- First step on any figural item?
- Name the rule in words ('it rotates 90° each step') before looking at the answer choices.
- Situational judgment test (SJT)?
- Items that present a realistic FBI work scenario and ask which response is most (and sometimes least) effective.
- 'Most effective' response?
- The one that best resolves the situation with sound, professional judgment — NOT the most assertive choice.
- First step on an SJT item?
- Identify the real problem the scenario poses before weighing the responses.
- How to narrow SJT choices?
- Eliminate responses that break a rule, are unethical, escalate needlessly, ignore the problem, or are purely passive.
- Is 'most assertive' the SJT answer?
- No — assertiveness isn't the standard. Effectiveness and appropriateness are.
- SJT response to an unverified rumor?
- Decline to spread it and discourage circulating unverified claims.
- SJT: missing a resource under deadline?
- Proactively reach out to the division that can provide it (initiative).
- SJT: pressured to skip a verification step?
- Complete the required step despite time pressure (integrity/accountability).
- SJT: giving a colleague critical feedback?
- Deliver it specifically and constructively while staying respectful (communication).
- SJT: strict rule would harm the operation?
- Apply a reasonable, policy-compliant alternative and document the rationale (judgment).
- How many FBI core competencies does SJT draw on?
- Up to all eight of the FBI's core competencies.
- Why answer SJT items consistently?
- A single, professional effectiveness standard applied every time beats answering by gut.
- SJT: 'least effective' item?
- Some items ask for the worst response too — judge it on the same effectiveness standard.
- Flexibility/adaptability on SJT?
- Adjusting smoothly to a sudden change in assignment without losing focus on the goal.
- Initiative on SJT?
- Acting proactively to solve a problem rather than waiting to be told.
- Collaboration on SJT?
- Working effectively with others and across divisions to reach the goal.
- Personality Assessment format?
- About 100 statements in a forced-choice slider format — 5 statement pairs per screen; you slide toward the statement that fits you more. Adaptive.
- Forced-choice item?
- Paired statements; you slide toward the one closer to you. No neutral position, and you can't agree with both equally.
- Is there a 'no opinion' option on personality items?
- No — the forced-choice format deliberately omits any neutral choice.
- What if both statements fit you?
- You still must pick the single statement that fits you slightly better.
- Can you agree with both forced-choice statements?
- No — choosing one treats the other as fitting you less.
- Why pair two plausible statements?
- To reveal genuine preferences instead of letting you pick an obvious 'right' answer.
- Is there a correct answer on the Personality Assessment?
- No — it measures your work style and traits; honest, consistent answers matter most.
- Should you try to fake the 'ideal agent'?
- No — faking tends to create inconsistent answers that can undermine your results.
- How to prepare for the personality section?
- You can't study content, but reflecting on real experiences beforehand helps you answer quickly and consistently.
- Personality forced-choice example?
- 'I prefer steady routines' vs. 'I prefer frequent variety' — slide toward the one that fits you more.
- What does the Personality Assessment measure?
- Work-style and personality traits relevant to the Special Agent role.
- Forced-choice vs. agree/disagree?
- Forced-choice pairs two statements and you pick between them; agree/disagree (Likert) rates one statement at a time.
- Preferences & Interests format?
- One self-descriptive statement at a time, rated on a graded agreement scale (e.g., 5 points).
- What does the agreement scale ask?
- How strongly you agree or disagree with the statement.
- What does a 'graded' scale capture?
- Strength of preference — answers can land at different points between the two extremes.
- Five-point agreement scale steps?
- Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree.
- How to answer when a statement describes you well?
- Choose toward the 'strongly agree' end — honestly reflect how strongly it fits.
- Weakest disagreement on the scale?
- A small step from neutral toward 'disagree.'
- Is there a correct answer on Preferences & Interests?
- No — it's a self-report of your genuine preferences and interests.
- Why honesty on the preference scale?
- Honest, consistent self-report is what the section is designed to measure; gaming it is counterproductive.
- Two candidates both 'agree' — how is intensity captured?
- The one who feels more strongly picks a point closer to the 'strongly agree' extreme.
- Biographical/experience inventory?
- Items about your background, preferences, and interests — answered by self-report, not study.
- What does SASS stand for?
- The Special Agent Selection System — the FBI's multi-stage hiring process for Special Agents.
- Where does Phase I sit in SASS?
- It's the first competitive testing hurdle — pass it to advance to Phase II.
- Phase I format?
- A computerized, proctored assessment battery of about 176 items (11+9+100+37+19) in roughly 3 hours.
- Is Phase I scored or pass/fail?
- Pass/fail and competitive — you get a pass/fail letter, not a numeric score. You must pass to continue.
- The five Phase I sections?
- Logic-Based Reasoning, Figural Reasoning, Personality Assessment, Preferences & Interests, and Situational Judgment.
- Which Phase I sections have right answers?
- Only the two reasoning sections (Logic-Based and Figural). The three behavioral sections have no correct answer.
- What is Phase II?
- A written essay assessment plus a structured interview with a panel of three special agents, scoring the FBI Core Competencies.
- Phase I retake policy?
- Candidates who don't pass may retest after a waiting period; failing twice generally results in deactivation.
- How soon are Phase I results given?
- Results are commonly reported within about an hour of finishing, though the FBI doesn't publish a fixed window. A pass/fail letter follows.
- What comes after passing Phase I and II?
- A conditional appointment offer, then background investigation, polygraph, medical exam, drug test, and the PFT.
- Where do Special Agents train?
- The FBI Academy at Quantico, Virginia — the ~16-week Basic Field Training Course (BFTC).
- What is the PFT?
- The Physical Fitness Test — a separate fitness standard later in the SASS process.
- Basic eligibility for Special Agent?
- U.S. citizenship, generally age 23–36, a bachelor's degree, a valid driver's license, and about 2 years of work experience.
- Can you study the content of Phase I?
- You can practice the reasoning sections; you can't 'study' the behavioral sections, but you can learn their format.
- Best prep the night before Phase I?
- Rest well rather than cramming — the reasoning sections reward a clear, alert mind, not memorized facts.
- Phase II written assessment?
- A ~2.5-hour exercise: analyze a fictional scenario and write two reports — testing data analysis and written communication (no spell-check).
- How long does the SASS process take?
- Generally at least a year, often longer, depending on federal funding and hiring goals.
- Does the FBI endorse outside Phase I prep?
- No — the FBI endorses only FBIJobs.gov and its own testing guide, which includes a sample practice test.
- 'Beat the test' warning?
- Don't claim qualities or experiences you don't have. Falsification found later (background, polygraph) can permanently bar you from employment.
- Why is consistency important on Phase I?
- The personality section is adaptive and later steps (interview, polygraph, background) cross-check your stated traits against reality.
- Logic & figural item format?
- Five-option multiple choice. Logic gives a fact paragraph; figural gives an image sequence with a missing piece.